“For those already languishing in prison due to disclosure failures, it has taken far too long for our justice system to live up to its name.” FACT (Falsely Accused Carers and Teachers) comment on the recent Justice Committee Report on Disclosure findings. September 2018
Miscarriages of justice happen. Even in the best legal systems. Most people believe that there are systems in place to put things right. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) was set up following the notorious cases of the Guilford 4 and the Birmingham 6 to do just that.
But it doesn’t work like that in reality. The CCRC is often unable to help victims of wrongful conviction. The prisoner has been found guilty by a court and therefore remains guilty in the eyes of the public as well as the Criminal Justice System; and it does not stop there…The Problem
To challenge the policy and practice in the current system through which prisoners who maintain their innocence are reviewed and progressed.Objectives
- Falsely Accused Carers and Teachers: AGM and conference: Saturday 29 September, BIRMINGHAM. See ‘Useful Links’ tab for their website.
- United Against Injustice: conference Saturday, 13 October. LIVERPOOL. See ‘Useful Links’ tab for their website.
- Inside Time article published: an article summarising the results of 200 replies to our questionnaire has been published in Inside Time. You can find it on their website, August edition, p.22.
- A useful article: Dean Kingham (Parole Board lead for the Association of Prison Lawyers) has written about how Offending Behaviour Programmes play an over dominant role in assessing a prisoner’s level of risk:
“Whether a prisoner has completed an accredited programme has been seen as central to whether risk has been reduced. Arguments to parole boards that accredited offending behaviour programmes are not necessary for release/progression have regularly fallen on deaf ears… For those maintaining their innocence this can be a particular problem, particularly given maintaining innocence or the favoured term ‘in denial’ has been seen to be a significant risk factor. Within the last 12 months there has been a breakthrough as psychological research studies have shown this is not the case and maintaining innocence can actually be a protective factor….” If you would like a copy of Dean Kingham’s paper, please write to PPMI enclosing a stamped addressed envelope.